Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrea Lazaro Garcia vs Linda Noskova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garcia vs Noskova analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Andrea Lazaro Garcia vs Linda Noskova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Garcia 1 - 0 Noskova
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia has won 47.65% of points on their second serve, while Noskova has won 46.97%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia, in recent form, has won 61.94% of their opponent's second serve points, while Noskova has won 51.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.52% and 33.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia has saved 53.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Noskova has saved 58.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia has won 72.55% of matches played (W/L 37/ 14), with Noskova winning 63.46% (W/L 33/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 73/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1). Noskova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 78% (W/L 43/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Garcia has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 32/ 14), where as Noskova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 64% of matches (W/L 16/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Garcia winning 1 times and Noskova being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Garcia winning 2 and Noskova winning 0. The last match between Garcia and Noskova was at the W25 Manacor, 01-02-2022, First, Hard with Andrea Lazaro Garcia getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Garcia and Noskova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Garcia winning 0 times and Noskova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Garcia winning 0, and Noskova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.12 while Noskova has played against players with an average rank of 104.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Noskova has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia has converted 52.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Noskova has converted 43.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
371
Rank
180
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
26
Rank
26
High
19
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
61% (270-170)
Career Total W/L
67% (138-68)
80% (32-8)
YTD W/L
61% (19-12)
$121,607
Career Prize Money
$1,689,608
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Andrea Lazaro Garcia vs Linda Noskova For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Garcia VS Noskova
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Andrea Lazaro Garcia | Linda Noskova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:50:0 | 1:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (48/76) | 57% (44/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (31/48) | 43% (19/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 32% (9/28) | 45% (15/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (43/77) | 47% (36/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Linda Noskova
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
43 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrea Lazaro Garcia | Linda Noskova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 80% (32/8) | 61% (19/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 75% (66/22) | 58% (43/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 61% (471/303) | 50% (363/357) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 70% (14/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (32/8) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 27 | 145 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 155 | 124 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:34 | 1:40:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.25 | 94.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1513/2493) | 62% (1437/2327) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (942/1513) | 69% (988/1437) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (467/980) | 47% (418/890) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (223/425) | 43% (94/218) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (1364/2592) | 40% (936/2330) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 77% (27/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 82% (32/39) | 60% (18/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 91% (10/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 54% (7/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 93% (29/27) | 76% (21/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 7% (29/2) | 24% (21/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 45% (11/5) | 30% (10/3) |
Andrea Lazaro Garcia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Berfu Cengiz
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
50%
(
52 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Alice Tubello
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Olivia Gram
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
17 of
36)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
11
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Stina Larsson
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
98)
1
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
10
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Cagla Buyukakcay
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
56%
(
10 of
18)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
89%
(
16 of
18)
31
Total Points Won
9
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
Player
Angela Fita Boluda
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
34 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Linda Noskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Linda Noskova
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Taylor Townsend
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
7
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ons Jabeur
Player
Linda Noskova
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Angelique Kerber
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
7
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
54 of
77)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Linda Noskova
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Harriet Dart
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Qinwen Zheng
Player
Linda Noskova
42%
(
30 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Lucrezia Stefanini
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Linda Noskova
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Linda Noskova
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Garcia Vs Noskova Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Garcia are available here and Noskova photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Linda Noskova
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
